The Magic of Compounding Returns, The Tyranny of Compounding Costs – John Bogle

Johnny HopkinsJohn Bogle, Research, Resources, Study3 Comments

(Image, John Bogle on the Rise of Index Funds, accessed 16 July 2016, http://www.barrons.com/)

Have you ever looked at the statement you receive from your investment manager and wondered, what the heck are they talking about!

You think you’re getting good returns but it turns out you’re underperforming. The question is, WHY?

One reason that investors continue to underperform is provided by a simple illustration from John Bogle in his book, The Little Book of Common Sense Investing.

John Bogle is the founder and retired CEO of The Vanguard Group. He was also named one of the “world’s 100 most powerful and influential people”, by Time magazine in 2004.

Bogle’s innovative idea was creating the world’s first index mutual fund in 1975. Bogle’s idea was that instead of beating the index and charging high costs, the index fund would mimic the index performance over the long run. Thus, achieving higher returns with lower costs than actively managed funds.

Let’s see what he has to say.

One of my favorite chapters in Bogle’s book is Chapter 4 titled, How Most Investors Turn a Winner’s Game into a Loser’s Game.

He says:

“Before we turn to the success of indexing as an investment strategy, let’s explore in a bit more depth just why it is that investors as a group fail to earn the returns that our corporations generate through their dividends and earnings growth, ultimately reflected in the prices of their stocks.”

“To understand why they do not, we need only to recognize the simple mathematics of investing:”

“All investors as a group must necessarily earn precisely the market return, but only before the costs of investing are deducted.”

“Investors pay far too little attention to the costs of investing.  It’s especially easy to underrate their importance under today’s three conditions:

(1) when so many costs are hidden from view (portfolio transaction costs, the unrecognized impact of front-end sales cha[n]ges, taxes incurred on realized gains);

(2) when stock market returns have been high (during the 1980s and 1990s, stock returns averaged 17.5 percent per year, and the average fund provided a nontrivial—but clearly inadequate—return of 15 percent); and especially;

(3) when investors focus on short-term returns, ignoring the truly confiscatory impact of cost over an investment lifetime.”

“Based on these assumptions, let’s look at the returns earned on $10,000 over 50 years (Exhibit 4.1 below). The simple investment in the stock market grows to $469,000, a remarkable illustration of the magic of compounding returns over an investment lifetime.”

(Source: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing)

“In the early years, the line showing the growth at a 5.5 percent annual rate doesn’t look all that different from the growth in the stock market itself. But ever so slowly, the lines begin to diverge, finally at a truly dramatic rate. By the end of the long period, the value accumulated in the fund totals just $145,400, an astounding shortfall of $323,600 to the cumulative return earned in the market itself.”

“In the investment field, time doesn’t heal all wounds.”

“In the investment field, time doesn’t heal all wounds. It makes them worse. Where returns are concerned, time is your friend. But where costs are concerned, time is your enemy. This point is powerfully illustrated when we consider how much of the value of the $10,000 investment is eroded with each passing year (Exhibit 4.2 below).”

(Source: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing)

“By the end of the first year, only about 2 percent of the value of your capital has vanished ($10,800 vs. $10,550). By the 10th year, 21 percent has vanished ($21,600 vs. $17,100). By the 30th year, 50 percent has vanished ($100,600 vs. $49,800). And by the end of the investment period, costs have consumed nearly 70 percent of the potential accumulation available simply by holding the market portfolio.”

“The investor, who put up 100 percent of the capital and assumed 100 percent of the risk, earned only 31 percent of the market return. The system of financial intermediation, which put up zero percent of the capital and assumed zero percent of the risk, essentially confiscated 70 percent of that return—surely the lion’s share. What you see here—and please don’t ever forget it!—is that over the long term, the miracle of compounding returns is overwhelmed by the tyranny of compounding costs.”

“The miracle of compounding returns is overwhelmed by the tyranny of compounding costs.”

Don’t you love it when really smart people, like Bogle, provide such simple illustrations on what happens when you decide to leave you money with some investment managers. He of course recommends an index fund, while I personally prefer the screens here at The Acquirer’s Multiple.

Concentrated investing using value stocks like the ones provided here, have historically proven to be one of the most successful methods of achieving long term out-performance in the stock market.

To get started with your new value investing strategy. FREE this month!

This month you can get FREE access to the top 30 value stocks in the Large Cap 1000 universe. To get FREE access to the Large Cap 1000 Screener, simply subscribe here. (No credit card required).

For more articles like this, check out our recent articles here.

FREE Stock Screener

Don’t forget to check out our FREE Large Cap 1000 – Stock Screener, here at The Acquirer’s Multiple:

unlimited

Join 11,510 other investors in search of undervalued stocks, value investing news, and investing strategies from the greats:

3 Comments on “The Magic of Compounding Returns, The Tyranny of Compounding Costs – John Bogle”

  1. Mr. Hopkins,

    Outstanding post! I love Mr. Bogle’s teaching and agree with him so much. I also read The Little Book of Common Sense Investing. My favorite book of his is;

    The Clash of Cultures: Investment vs Speculation

    https://www.amazon.com/Clash-Cultures-Investment-vs-Speculation/dp/1118122771/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1468864032&sr=8-1&keywords=the+clash+of+the+cultures+investment+vs.+speculation

    With Bogle’s writings;

    1. What do you think about the traditional 2% and 20% of profits from many actively managed funds?

    2. Do you think it is most wise to just go Index Fund(s) all the way as Bogle suggests and shows with strong quantitative evidence?

    3. Or do you think to have a asset allocation in some Index Funds and then other ideas?

    Wonderful post again, Vanguard and Bogle’s methodology about being a true mutual was and still is so amazing. He seems to be one of the only people I can think of that passed over the chance to make so much more money (he could probably be a billionaire if he wanted to be). Vanguard could easily charge 1 more basis point on most all products or more, they choose to stick by their values. Just an amazing company.

  2. Hey David.

    Great comments.

    1. I don’t think too much about it.

    2. I simply stick to the value investing strategy here at The Acquirers Multiple.

    3. See 2 above.

  3. So what if you mitigated costs, saved like crazy during those years when the children are gone and it is just you and your spouse. Reduced the risk to as close to zero as possible. At some point could you reach a level of savings in relation to your cost of or standard of living, where low returns would not be wiped out by return costs and inflation during your distribution years of your life. Your retirement years would be relatively uneventful in regard to investment fluctuations during your distribution years and still offer the flexibility to off set life events. Just a thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.